Did you lose money with Paul Lebel, a former broker with LPL Financial? If so, the attorneys at Stoltmann Law Offices may be able to help you bring legal recourse against LPL for failing to supervise him while he was registered there, causing investment losses. Firms such as LPL may be responsible for financial losses and we bring legal action against firms such as LPL in the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration process on a contingency fee basis. This means, we don’t make money unless you recover yours. The call to us is free with no obligation, so please call today. 312-332-4200. Our law offices are based in Chicago.
According to a recent InvestmentNews article, Paul Lebel was barred from the industry on Tuesday by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for churning and excessively trading mutual funds in customer accounts and generating excess fees. He was accused of defrauding four customers in several of their accounts, according to an SEC administrative proceeding against him. It stated: “In particular, Lebel exercised de facto control over these customers’ accounts and excessively traded mutual fund shares which carry large front-end load fees.” These mutual fund shares were A shares, which are typically meant to be long-term, buy-and-hold investments. Mr. Lebel allegedly made $50,000 in commissions from the sale of them. A broker such as Mr. Lebel must take into account a customer’s net worth, investment objectives, investment sophistication and age, among other factors before recommending an investment to them. If he does not, his firm may be responsible for investment losses. Churning, or excessive trading is an especially egregious securities law violation, as it typically generates large fees for the broker and causes the client to pay unnecessary and, sometimes, high fees.
According to his online FINRA BrokerCheck report, Lebel was registered with Montano Securities Corp, Gruntal & Co., AG Edwards & Sons, Oppenheimer & Co., LPL Financial in Cambridge, Massachusetts from August 2008 until November 2014 and Wood (Arthur W.) Company. He has eight judgment/liens against him. He is not licensed within the industry at this time.
The posting on this site are mere OPINIONS and NOT statements of fact in any way whatsoever. The information should not be relied upon and there have been no findings made against the firms or individuals referenced on this site. In addition, this Blog is made available for educational purposes only and incorporates information from the web as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and Stoltmann Law Offices (161 N Clark Street 16th Floor Chicago, IL 60601). The Blog opinions should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
PLEASE NOTE THIS IS ADVERTISING AND IT IS NOT A NEWSPAPER ARTICLE OR POST FROM AN INDEPENDENT OR NON-BIASED, NEWS SITE, NEWS SOURCE OR NEWSPAPER.