The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently issued a complaint against The Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation (RIEDC) after it allegedly issued $75 million in bonds for the 38 Studios project. The project was intended to spur economic development and increase employment opportunities by loaning bond proceeds to private companies. The SEC alleged that RIEDC loaned only $50 million in bond proceeds to 38 Studios. Remaing proceeds were used to pay related bond offering expenses and establish a reserve fund and a capitalized interest fund. Wells Fargo offered the bonds and the brokerage firm allegedly failed to disclose to investors that 38 Studios had conveyed it needed at least $75 million in funding to produce a video game. Therefore, investors were not fully informed when deciding to purchase the bonds that 38 Studios faced a funding shortfall. Because they were unable to produce more funding, the video game did not materialize and the company defaulted on the loans.
Wells Fargo’s lead banker, Peter M. Cannava, and two RIEDC executives, Keith W. Stokes and James Michael Saul were charged with aiding and abetting the fraud. Stokes and Saul each paid a $25,000 fine. They were prohibited from participating in any future municipal securities offerings. SEC continues litigation against Cannava, Wells Fargo and RIEDC. The SEC complaint also alleged that Wells Fargo and Cannava misled investors in bond offering materials. Investors were not informed that the brokerage firm had a side deal with 38 Studios that enabled the firm to receive nearly double the amount of compensation disclosed in offering documents. Cannava was ultimately responsible for failing to disclose additional fees.
The posting on this site are mere OPINIONS and NOT statements of fact in any way whatsoever. The information should not be relied upon and there have been no findings made against the firms or individuals referenced on this site. In addition, this Blog is made available for educational purposes only and incorporates information from the web as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and Stoltmann Law Offices (161 N Clark Street 16th Floor Chicago, IL 60601). The Blog opinions should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
PLEASE NOTE THIS IS ADVERTISING AND IT IS NOT A NEWSPAPER ARTICLE OR POST FROM AN INDEPENDENT OR NON-BIASED, NEWS SITE, NEWS SOURCE OR NEWSPAPER.